As a set of uncoordinated but interacting parts, multi-agent systems
are a fertile ground for emergent behaviors. These systems evolve over
time as the agents are updated, added and removed. Furthermore, they
evolve as the environments they interact with change. This happens at
the speed and scale of computation. Multi agent systems like these are
increasingly common in more settings. This year’s mini challenges
highlight some issues in working with such systems, derived from
research into how they fail. The issues that surfaced in these
challenges illustrate a few failure modes, but there are many
more.
There will be a consistent need in coming years to investigate system
behaviors and diagnose failure modes. These needs are the motivation for
this year’s VAST challenge (and likely future VAST challenge and
real-world challenges). This year’s design challenge asks you to look
forward toward those other scenarios.
What tools will be needed to explore the data in such environments? Key
challenges stem from:
There are many challenges you could take on in this space. These include:
In all the above challenges, there is ample room for both human and automated reasoning to be applied. The design challenge encourages you to come up with innovative ways to integrate these types of reasoning.
This is an open design challenge. Please create a submission in markdown format that describes a design for addressing the challenges.
You may assume detection is tractable, timely and provided in a format of your convenience.
Working software is not required, though it is welcome if you produce it. For parts that are not implemented, please describe what further algorithms would be required for the monitoring & communication.
Cite inspirations from other fields. You may use this data, but do not feel obligated to. If you use other data sources, please only use open available datasets.
You may include in your submission:
Design evolution: A description of choices made at each step of a design’s refinement.
Failed ideas: Things that were experimented with that did not work out. Include a discussion of (1) why you thought they would work and (2) what you found out through your evaluation process.
Hand-made concept sketch.
The submission format is a markdown document including images and a video. Please use your judgement on how to best communicate your ideas, however a rough length of 4 pages including images is requested.